|
|
Subject - Code Question of the day
|
|
Wirenutz
|
I'd like to pass on a nifty neca-neis ditty that anyone here can recieve daily in thier e-mail w/signup
maybe some of you have it already ? methinks it helps to keep one current on dosde issues
~W~
|
|
Wirenutz
| quote: Originally posted by Wirenutz
I'd like to pass on a nifty neca-neis ditty that anyone here can recieve daily in thier e-mail w/signup
maybe some of you have it already ? methinks it helps to keep one current on code issues
~W~
sorry, musta lost that edit function?
here ya go....
quote:
The 2005 National Electrical Code is the bedrock of the electrical construction business. Do you know all the ins and outs of the Code? NECA and Electrical Contractor magazine are pleased to present their daily online feature, "Code Question of the Day."
The Code Question of the Day for Monday, March 7, 2005
Question: I am an inspector and have some issue with your putting the responsibility back on us to require the grounding stub indicated in the Code Question of the Day February 9, 2005. It is the responsibility of the permit holder, usually the general contractor, to ensure that all compliance requirements are met by all sub-contractors. Inspectors are there to verify compliance.
I, for one will be looking for some electrode connection as I am a combination inspector. There are however, those inspectors that will be building certified, inspecting the concrete placement, who have no knowledge of the electrical requirements. This is true to a greater extent in commercial, because residential inspectors are generally 4-way certified.
The question is ultimately, how do we as a group of construction professionals complete overlapping tasks? The general has, due to his licensure subjected himself to this task and responsibility. It is the job of the electrical contractors and inspectors to educate them as to their ultimate responsibility, that is, to ensure that we have what we need when we get there.
Architects and engineers also share in the responsibility of ensuring that the requirements are called out on the plans and specs.
(P.S. I am grateful for this forum to discuss important issues such as these.) Terry
The answer to today's Code Question will be sent via e-mail in tomorrow's Question.
http://neca-neis.org/cqd/index.cfm?UUID=1720&date=Monday%2C%20March%207%2C%202005 ------------------------------------
Answer to Previous Code Question of the Day for Friday, March 4, 2005
Question: What are the conductors from a separately derived system to the main disconnect called?
Thanks, John
Answer: Hi John, I don't know of any place in the NEC that specifically names them. NEC 250.30 makes reference to a system bonding jumper. I would call them the system-entrance conductors terminating in the main system disconnecting means.
Since "service" by definition is apparently reserved for a serving utility, I would substitute "system" for service wherever that word is used.
Section: 250.30
Source: Charlie Trout
************************************
Answers are the source's opinions and do not represent formal interpretations of the National Electrical Code.
Answer to Previous Code Question of the Day.
Submit your question to brooke@necanet.org. To remove yourself from this list, please send an e-mail to ewarner@necanet.org. Learn more about NECA's "National Electrical Installation Standards" at www.neca-neis.org.
To remove yourself from this list, please send an e-mail to neis@necanet.org
NECA welcomes your thoughts and comments on Code Question of the Day. Send e-mail to: brooke@necanet.org
BROOKE STAUFFER Executive Director, Standards & Safety National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA) brooke@necanet.org
|
|
Ryan_J
| Regarding the second question: Those would be called a "feeder circuit" or "transformer secondary conductors".
|
|
kbsparky
| I've been on their e-mailing list for a couple of years now. Interesting reading, they even put one of my queries in there once
|
|
lctrc789
| Talking about looking for proper grounding electrode connections, how many times have I seen a beam clamp used for bonding on beams, I have given a lot of non compliance tags for this and always get the argument that it is bonded, My quote is this they are not for grounding or bonding but for use a a clamping or holding device.
|
|
kbsparky
| Too lazy to drill a hole in that beam, and install a proper lug?
|
|